Empowering Patient Engagement in HTA: Lessons from an AI-Generated Plain Language Summary Case Study
December 2, 2025
The challenge: Making HTA understandable to everyone
Health technology assessments (HTAs) play a critical role in determining which treatments and innovations are adopted within healthcare systems. However, the technical language and complexity of HTA reports often make them inaccessible to patients and caregivers — the very individuals whose lives these decisions affect the most.
Plain Language Summaries (PLS) are designed to close this gap. They can translate HTA findings into clear, patient-friendly language, empowering people to engage meaningfully in healthcare decisions. Yet, producing high-quality PLS documents is a slow and resource-intensive process. Teams must balance scientific rigor with readability, cultural sensitivity, and accuracy — a demanding task that limits scalability.
This is where artificial intelligence (AI) offers a transformative opportunity.
The study: Can generative AI help bridge the communication gap?
At ISPOR Europe 2025, we presented a pioneering study exploring whether generative AI can create accurate and patient-friendly summaries from complex HTA documents.
Using a NICE Highly Specialized Technologies (HST) guidance on onasemnogene abeparvovec (a gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy), the team tested Google Gemini, a large language model, to generate a full PLS automatically.
The AI-generated summary was evaluated across 18 quality measures covering readability, accuracy, relevance, and tone. A “human-in-the-loop” reviewer ensured alignment with patient communication standards and European HTA Regulation principles — integrating transparency and patient empowerment into the assessment.
The results: Speed meets substance
The results were striking. The AI produced an eight-page (2,570-word) PLS in just 15 seconds, structured around all key HTA components — disease context, treatment mechanism, clinical effectiveness, safety, and patient impact.
Across 18 evaluation criteria, the PLS achieved an average score of 8.27/10, reflecting strong alignment with plain language and patient-centered communication standards.
- Mechanism simplicity (9.2/10) and plain language explanation (8.9/10) were top-performing categories, demonstrating Gemini’s ability to simplify complex gene therapy concepts without sacrificing accuracy.
- The document met CEFR B1 readability, ensuring accessibility for non-specialist audiences.
However, the AI struggled with target population clarity (6.8/10) and unmet need articulation (6.5/10) — areas requiring deeper contextual and emotional nuance. These findings underscore the importance of maintaining a human role in refining and validating AI outputs, especially when tailoring content for specific patient groups.
The implications: Toward patient-centered HTA with AI
The study demonstrates that AI can accelerate and enhance the creation of patient-friendly HTA communications, promoting inclusivity and transparency in healthcare decision-making. But it also emphasizes that AI should complement, not replace, human expertise.
Generative AI tools like Gemini can help:
- Scale patient engagement, enabling broader and faster dissemination of accessible HTA information.
- Support regulatory compliance, aligning with EU HTA Regulation principles of transparency and participation.
- Enhance health literacy, fostering more equitable and informed patient involvement.
Yet, meaningful adoption requires:
- Human-in-the-loop systems to verify accuracy, tone, and contextual relevance.
- Prompt optimization to capture nuances like unmet needs or cultural differences.
- Ongoing validation to ensure reliability and regulatory alignment.
The conclusion: AI as a partner in patient empowerment
This work highlights how AI, when thoughtfully integrated, can make HTA more human-centered, transparent, and inclusive. Rather than automating empathy, it can help scale understanding — bringing patients into the conversation, not leaving them behind.
As HTA continues to evolve under new European regulations, embedding AI into communication workflows may mark a key step toward a truly patient-centered future — where every individual can understand, question, and contribute to the health decisions that shape their lives.
Interested in learning more?
Read the abstract published at ISPOR EUROPE 2025: “Can Generative AI Deliver Patient-Friendly Summaries? A Case Study Using NICE Guidance for Spinal Muscular Atrophy” by Manuel Cossio and Ramiro E. Gilardino.
Contact Us!Subscribe to our newsletter
Manuel Cossio
Head of AI Solutions, Real-World Evidence, Value, and Access
Manuel Cossio is Head of AI Solutions, Real-World Evidence, Value, and Access at Cytel. Manuel is an AI engineer with over a decade of experience in healthcare AI research and development. He currently leads the creation of generative AI solutions aimed at optimizing clinical trials, focusing on hierarchical multi-agent systems with multistage data governance and human-in-the-loop dynamic behavior control.
Manuel has an extensive research background with publications in computer vision, natural language processing, and genetic data analysis. He is a registered Key Opinion Leader at the Digital Medicine Society, a member of the ISPOR Community of Interest in AI, a Generative AI evaluator for the EU Commission, and an AI researcher at UB-UPC- Barcelona Supercomputing Center.
He holds an M.Sc. in Translational Medicine from Universitat de Barcelona, a Master of Engineering in AI from Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, and a M.Sc. in Neuroscience from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Read full employee bioClaim your free 30-minute strategy session
Book a free, no-obligation strategy session with a Cytel expert to get advice on how to improve your drug’s probability of success and plot a clearer route to market.